James & Wells ranked as leading firm by IAM 1000, ten experts recognised as leading practitioners

June 7, 2024

James & Wells ranked as leading firm by IAM 1000, ten experts recognised as leading practitioners

Authors

Marketing and Business Development Executive

We are delighted to share that 10 leading James & Wells intellectual property experts have been recognised by IAM 1000, the world’s leading patent professionals guide in 2024. The following James & Wells IP practitioners have been ranked by IAM 1000 2024 as Recommended Individuals:

Australia

Adam Luxton

Nick Mountford

Janelle Borham

Andrew Clarke

New Zealand

Ian Finch

Jonathan Lucas

Jason Rogers

Mike Flint

Gus Hazel

Britta Fromow

Along with our recognised individuals, IAM 1000 has also awarded James & Wells a bronze ranking in patent prosecution in Australia. In New Zealand, IAM 1000 lists James & Wells as a recommended firm in patent litigation and patent prosecution.

IAM 1000 is a market-leading guide that identifies and profiles leading private practice professionals and firms in the world’s leading jurisdictions with data collected through market research, firm submissions, and client feedback.

Insights & Resources

View All Insights

News

Three James & Wells IP practitioners recognised by IAM as Global Leaders 2025

We are delighted to acknowledge the recognition received by partners Janelle Borham, Jason Rogers, and Ian Finch as IAM Global Leaders 2025. To qualify for inclusion in the IAM Global Leaders, individuals must be ranked in the gold tier of the IAM Patent 1000, the market-leading annual directory that identifies the top law and attorney...

Litigation

Not in the textbook: unravelling ownership of academic inventions

Introduction It’s not always straightforward to work out who owns intellectual property (IP) rights in an invention developed in the academic context. This article provides some pointers on where the answer may be found and issues that could impact the outcome. Where to look: Legislation: In contrast to various overseas jurisdictions,[1] New Zealand and Australian...

Patents

Best method requirement in Australian and New Zealand Patent Law

A recent decision of Justice Burley in the Federal Court of Australia[1] has shone a light on the requirement of a patentee to disclose the best method of implementing his/her/its invention. In Australia[2], as in New Zealand[3], it is a requirement for the valid grant of patent rights that the patentee discloses “the best method...

View All Insights